Building on the approved Emissions Adjustments Across All Chains, this proposal seeks to fund the reward distributors for an additional three months to maintain XVS emissions and continue monitoring market performance. The required amounts for each chain and location are as follows:
Source of funds: Comptroller contract on BNB Chain
Details
The XVS will be distributed based on the following tables:
ZKSync
Pool
Market
Monthly Allocation (XVS)
3 Month Allocation (XVS)
Core
ZKSync
630
1890
Core
ETH
600
1800
Core
BTC
600
1800
Core
USDT
450
1350
Core
USDC.e
900
2700
Vault
XVS
1,050
3,150
Total
4,230
12,690
Arbitrum
Pool
Market
New Allocation (XVS)
3 Month Allocation (XVS)
Core
ARB
239
717
Core
WETH
239
717
Core
WBTC
319
957
Core
USDT
479
1437
Core
USDC
479
1437
LST
WETH
1020
3,060
Vault
XVS
1,050
3,150
Total
3,825
11,475
Ethereum Mainnet
Pool
Market
New Allocation (XVS)
3 Month Allocation (XVS)
Core
WETH
475
1,425
Core
WBTC
949
2,847
Core
USDT
1,709
5,127
Core
USDC
1,709
5,127
LST
ETH
3713
11,139
Vault
XVS
5,040
15,120
Total
13,595
40,785
BNB Chain
Pool
Market
New Allocation (XVS)
3 Month Allocation (XVS)
Core
XVS
900
2,700
Vault
VAI
2,813
8,439
Vault
XVS
13,230
39,690
Total
16,943
50,829
Action Plan
A VIP proposal will be created to transfer the required XVS amounts to the treasury on each chain. These funds will later be moved to the reward distribution contracts and the XVS store based on the specified amounts. This process will sustain emissions for an additional three months, after which further adjustments will be proposed based on updated performance data.
The emissions on other chains are higher compared to the emissions on the BNB chain. Since 90% of the TVL in the protocol comes from the BNB chain, the emissions on the BNB chain should remain fixed, while the emissions on other chains should be reduced.
Im against this proposal. And the xvs emision should be 0 on all chains, except vaults, and should be autocompounded to the 7d lock. We should find another way to reward protocol users, without generating sell presure for out beloved xvs. Lookup onchain sells, majority comes feom rewarded protoocl users.
I also do not agree on emissions. We did the reduction for what then? The emissions should be improved in the prime vault, not in the core pool. We are boosting long term holders, aint it? Also, I think there is too much effort in chains that we do not cause impact, like Eth. Main efforts should be made in chains that we can positionate in an advantage position, instead of investing resources in actions that bring little to cero turnover.
Guys, we reduced emissions by 55% and we will continue to reduce them again, ‘‘0’’ is the goal but these suggestions to stop it completely now does not make sense to me. Venus invested into deployments on new Blockchains so now we have to work to make them profitable, for example ZKSync Ignite is also around the corner, i really won’t to stop emissions now as they are and they will be very likely our advantage against AAVE, we gained a lot of ZK holders for our markets and we want to squeeze this opportunity and others as much as possible. In the end it will be gradually reduced as it was discussed many times. What’s your strategy if you just cut everything in current situation?
I agree with this proposal. We should not cut/reduce emissions for other chains in order to continue growing. This is clearly not the best time to cut everything.
The goal is to improve TVL on Ethereum, Arbitrum and ZKSync.
I completely agree with what Dom and Frayst mentioned. I believe the goal of Venus is to reduce emissions to zero, but I think now is not the right time. We should focus on increasing the TVL of Arbitrum, Ethereum, and zkSync. I believe this proposal is very well-founded, and I think it will bring significant growth to the TVLs of the mentioned networks.
In order to increase the TVL of other chains, XVS incentive rewards are indispensable. I also want to know when the Arbitrum grant and Zksync ignite incentives will be launched.
A great trend for those who are accumulating XVS. Fewer and fewer tokens are being issued, and this will lead to understandable consequences, if you know what I mean.