Proposal: IRM Adjustments for USDC and USDT on BNB Chain Core Pool

Summary

This proposal recommends flattening the interest rate model (IRM) curves for vUSDT and vUSDC in the BNB Chain Core Pool. The adjustment aims to:

  • Reduce borrowing costs for Venus borrowers
  • Increase market utilization, benefiting suppliers
  • Enable more efficient use of the e-mode feature

The suggested change is a single kink at 90% utilization with lower borrow rates, simplifying the curve and making it more attractive for borrowers and suppliers.


Rationale

  • At 90% utilization, borrow rates for stablecoins are currently higher on Venus compared with other protocols:
  • As a result, Venus markets see lower utilization compared with the current industry average which is close to 90%:
    • USDC: 68% utilization
    • USDT: 80% utilization
  • Flattening the IRM curves and moving the kink to 90% will lower borrowing costs, increase utilization, and enhance the efficiency of the e-mode feature, benefiting both borrowers and suppliers.

Proposed IRM Adjustments (vUSDT & vUSDC)

Parameter Current Suggested
Base Rate Annualized 0% no change
Kink 1 80% 90%
Rate at kink 1 8.33% 6.50%
Multiplier Annualized 10% 7.22%
Kink 2 90% -
Borrow rate at kink 2 16.18% -
Borrow rate at 100% 56.79% no change
Jump Multiplier Annualized 300% no change
Reserve Factor 10% no change
7 Likes

seems right movement. lets do this. i support new team vision of growing Protocol TVL and users attractivity.

1 Like

been calling forever for this, very happy to see it being implemented.

2 Likes

Great move, I like the improved conditions for borrowers - this is what is needed to attract users.

1 Like

Finally someone smart in the lead who know how to run Business

Let’s go !

1 Like

I support this proposal. We need to make Venus’ products more competitive.

1 Like

Overview

Chaos Labs supports the goal of lowering borrowing costs and improving utilization through adjustments to the IRM. While the proposal suggests moving to a single kink at 90%, our analysis shows that maintaining a two-kink structure achieves the same objectives while better containing volatility and preserving borrower stability. Below, we present our analysis and revised parameter recommendations.

Motivation

Over the past three months, both the USDT and USDC markets have shown limited momentum, aside from a brief uptick in utilization in late June to early July 2025. USDC utilization remained below 80% for most of the period and experienced a sharp drop in early September, now standing at 65.85%. USDT utilization has generally been higher than USDC’s but also stayed mostly below 80%, with no clear upward trend in the past two months. Given this demand profile, and considering Venus’s adjustments to incentives, we agree that lowering the kink APRs will reduce borrowing costs and support healthier utilization.

IRM Adjustments

We propose the following adjustments to the USDC and USDT IRM curves:

  • USDC: kink1 at 80% with a 6.5% target rate, kink2 at 90% with an 8.5% target rate, and 40% at full utilization.
  • USDT: kink1 at 80% with a 7.0% target rate, kink2 at 90% with a 9.0% target rate, and 40% at full utilization.

First, we believe these adjustments lower borrowing costs before kink1 and between kink1 and kink2, which can encourage higher utilization and move the markets toward a healthier balance. As shown in the figure below, the adjusted USDT curve flattens the borrow rate path before kink1 & kink2. In practice, this makes borrowing more capital-efficient and creates stronger incentives for users to increase utilization within typical utilization ranges.

At the same time, reducing the target rate at full utilization eases the severity of increases after kink2. This is especially important with the introduction of the new Stablecoin E-mode, where leveraged positions are expected to grow. A very steep slope after kink2 is destabilizing for such strategies: even small supply shifts can trigger abrupt APR spikes, which quickly push leveraged carry trades into losses and force rapid unwinds. By moderating the slope, the curve provides a smoother adjustment path that better supports sustainable leverage.


At the same time, this change does not compromise the mechanisms that protect against liquidity risk at higher utilization. The two-kink structure itself improves stability by introducing smoother, staged increases in the borrow rate. Instead of a sharp jump at a single kink, which can create sudden and punishing costs for borrowers, the two-kink model distributes the rate adjustment across two segments. This makes the path of rate increases more predictable and less disruptive to borrowers, while still ensuring strong disincentives against excessive utilization. In addition, in our proposal, slope2 is lowered slightly to reduce mid-range costs, but it remains steep enough to meaningfully raise the borrow rate as utilization moves toward kink2. Beyond kink2, even with a lower full-utilization target, the jump multiplier still drives borrowing costs up steeply, preserving a strong deterrent against excessive utilization and ensuring the system retains a robust buffer against liquidity stress.

Specification

USDT Interest Rate

Parameter Current Recommended
Base Rate 0 0
Borrow Rate(APR) at Kink 1 8% 7%
Kink 1 80% 80%
Borrow rate(APR) at Kink 2 15% 9%
Kink 2 90% 90%
Borrow Rate(APR) at 100% 45% 40%
Reserve Factor 10% 10%

USDC Interest Rate

Parameter Current Recommended
Base Rate 0 0
Borrow Rate(APR) at Kink 1 8% 6.5%
Kink 1 80% 80%
Borrow Rate(APR) at Kink 2 15% 8.5%
Kink 2 90% 90%
Borrow Rate(APR) at 100% 45% 40%
Reserve Factor 10% 10%

Disclaimer

Chaos Labs has not been compensated by any third party for publishing this recommendation.

First appreciate the input of Chaolabs

Definitely Chaolabs appreciation is more toward and more safe move while Dev proposal is more aggressive

I would still push for Dev proposal for parameters change

Venus is lagging behind and we are becoming uncompetitive to other protocol like aave which has a far more aggressive parameters

Right now, we cant play safe and always try to make small change, drastic change is highly need aswell our approach to parameters, we need to be aggressive and make our market attractive.

So I push for 90kink as propose by the Dev.

Flat and stable borrow until 90% is essential for anyone looking for strategic yield farming

We need proposal that would put us on the same playing field game as Aave or better. stop shooting on own foot and let other get their competitiveness advantages.

Let’s do it

sUSDe is currently yielding 5.8% and it’s 30 days average is sitting at 7% and you want to set the kink at 80% and 7% APY at kink? since you claim to understand so much about the behaviour of loopers, explain to me, why would anyone touch venus for looping when the base apy of the yield bearing asset is below the borrow rate of USDT and USDC?

Do you think people are suckers or what ffs.

Just cap the rates at 20% like you did for aave and everything will be fine.