Marus said that most community members support the retention of VRT. Is this really the case?
I don’t think that the discussion on the forum represents the overall public opinion. People will only come out to debate when their own interests are harmed. Keeping VRT is harmful to users who hold XVS. They did not express their views on the forum, just because they thought they were safe now.
The reason why the number of people who support the retention of VRT seems to be large, only because the interests of “VRT party” have been harmed under this proposal.
The biggest lie of the VRT party is: “Using VRT to replace XVS for emissions will reduce the selling pressure of XVS. I have a complete plan to prove this, so: believe me, let VRT take the lead, XVS will be better!”
The actual situation is: after the VRT is in the position, should Venus deal with the dump from the VRT? If you don’t deal with it, VRT will plummet, and the incentive effect of VRT is 0; to deal with? Okay, please hand over the value of XVS to VRT. As a result, the intrinsic value of XVS has fallen? Oh, that has nothing to do with me, because I have a heavy warehouse but only VRT~
Would the VRT party scream so loudly if it were not for self-interest?
It’s better to be more straightforward: I’m betting that the VRT is trapped to death, and the team hastened to come up with a favor and save me!
What kind of community opinion are you talking about? The interests of the holders of XVS are completely opposed to the interests of the VRT party. It is impossible for the public opinion of the Venus community to be consistent with that of the VRT！